Home -> Magazines -> Issues -> Articles in this issue -> View
M/A/R/R/S | |
M/A/R/R/SArticle from Music Technology, November 1987 | |
Making new music from old. Simon Trask talks to the musicians and DJs who made a No. 1 hit from a drum machine and other peoples' records.
Mix sequenced drums and bass with cut and scratched records and the result is an extremely unlikely No. 1 single. M/A/R/R/S pump up the volume on musical theft.

"Dave Darrell: The three-minute pop song is really quite an artificial, cosmetic format."
The bassline required a different approach, however, as their MC500 sequencer couldn't handle the step-time resolution they were looking for.
Young: "We had to sequence two patterns: one for the notes that fell on eighths and one for the notes that didn't, and then shift the second pattern using a delay line to get the slight changes in timing which give the bassline its particular feel."
They've since acquired a Steinberg Pro 16, which takes them a lot closer to the resolution they're looking for, but are already on the lookout for a sequencing package which offers even finer resolution.
"We do most of our stuff in step time, now. In fact, we've forgotten how to play keyboards. We have to work that way. A slight mistake - shifting by a couple of 96ths, say - and it doesn't really work.

"Martyn Young: 'Pump Up The Volume' is the only record I've done that I haven't got bored with."
"A good English example at the moment is Derek B's 'Get Down', which uses an old Studio One reggae/funk rhythm called 'Greedy G'." (A dub version of James Brown's 'Get On The Good Foot'; there's no avoiding the man.) "All they've done is whack a massive drum beat over the top and keep floating the 'Greedy G' rhythm underneath."
Steve Young: "There's been an interesting development in that record: two drum patterns from two different records running at the same time, sync'd up. The spin-offs from people doing things like that can be really good. For instance, you could try doing the same sort of thing with drum machines and sequencers."
Dorrell: "We've done it on 'Pump Up The Volume', in the Iranian vocal section. The bottom layer is the bass drum from 'Pump Up The Volume'. On top of that is a break, and on top of that is another break, then the first layer of vocals, and then the second layer of vocals. So you've got three drum patterns all running at the same time. That was sync'd up manually, with CJ continually adjusting the speed of the decks to keep everything in time."
IN ADDITION TO the breaks, 'Pump Up The Volume' uses scratched-in extracts from many sources including Public Enemy's 'Rebel Without A Pause', Original Concept's 'Pump That Bass', Trouble Funk's 'Pump Me Up', Pressure Drop's 'Rock The House' and the Criminal Element Orchestra's 'Put The Needle To The Record'. Using bits of other people's records is nothing new in this day and age. In fact, it's an integral part of hip hop. But one scratched-in record on the remix of 'Pump Up The Volume' is causing 4AD a lot of legal headaches.
Young: "There's thousands of records that use sampling, and we just wanted to be in amongst them. But now that the record's been so successful we're just like sitting ducks.
"My own feeling is that the samples on 'Pump Up The Volume' are used in a creative way. From our point of view we don't really infringe anyone in the way that we use samples. But there are other people who would disagree, I suppose.
"It's more like a collage of sounds. Artists were doing it years ago, and they didn't have any problems with copyright. We're just doing the same sort of thing."
The problem record is Stock, Aitken and Waterman's 'Roadblock', from which a short section is scratched in. It now looks certain that Pete Waterman will sue 4AD over unauthorised use of the record. If so, the action will become a test case for a grey legal area regarding the use of sampled performances (as opposed to sampled sounds), with potentially wide-ranging repercussions for the music industry.
Alongside this case lies another potential legal wrangle, this time concerning 'Pump Up The Volume' and the Phil Harding and Pete Waterman Red Ink remix of Sybil's 'My Love Is Guaranteed'. The disagreement in this instance is between Blue Mountain Music (publishers of the M/A/R/R/S track) and Intersong (publishers of the Sybil track). This is quite distinct from the 'Roadblock' case, as it is about wholesale copying, with the backing track of the Red Ink mix bearing a striking similarity to that of 'Pump Up The Volume'.
Traditionally, copyright is invested in the melodic and harmonic aspects of a piece of music, with rhythm coming a poor third. But in this instance, there is no melody in the traditional sense, and harmonically both tracks never move from the root of A minor - hardly grounds for sueing. Blue Mountain's contention is firstly that the bassline is the nearest thing to a melody on 'Pump Up The Volume', and secondly that it's permissible for the bass to carry a melody line. Intersong of course maintain otherwise.
The M/A/R/R/S foursome are most interested in the fact that Harding and Waterman haven't managed to recreate the feel of 'Pump Up The Volume'.

"Martyn Young: Everyone has their own view of where the line between plagiarism and creativity lies."
"When the stuff that's happening at IRCAM crosses over - basically when the likes of me can afford it - then sound and rhythm will really start to get interesting. The things they were doing on that Tomorrow's World programme [a recent special on technology in music] were completely new to me. There was an incredible human voice sound which transformed into a guitar note with such subtle changes. I'd like to get my hands on that technology. Do you think we could get in there?"
I didn't like to say that musicians working in popular music have about as much chance of getting into IRCAM as Pierre Boulez has of writing a number one hit.
Dorrell takes up the pro-sampling argument: "Recently I was listening to Eric B and Rakim's 'I Know You Got Soul' for the first time in ages. When the 'Pump Up The Volume' phrase comes in it just sounds different; you can recognise it, but it's not what we've done with it. It's all down to the context of the phrase.
"I heard about a recent court case in the States where the ruling was in favour of the samplers who were being prosecuted, because the samples were deemed by the judge to have been artistically and creatively used."
So why not just get someone into the studio to do a voice-over of the "pump up the volume" phrase and save all the hassle?
Young: "It's not the same. It just doesn't have the same sound. We've had to redo some stuff for America, and rewrite some words; anyone who hears the track will know exactly what we've done. We've got round the copyright problem, but in doing that we've done something which to us is worse."
Dorrell: "We've bastardised it. Which is a shame because, in the context it was being used, the original was brilliant. Through making changes you demean the track. You don't enhance it by doing everything yourself."
"Drawing on other sources", interjects Young, "is what gives a track its collage effect. You have different reverbs, different sounds, different feels... It's the mixture of all those things going together."
Could it be that people are listening to music in a different way in these modern times?
"Definitely", asserts Dorrell. "Listen to Double Dee and Steinski's 'Lesson One', 'Lesson Two' and 'Lesson Three' - particularly 'Three', which is the breaks track. If you can listen to that then you can listen to our track no problem. We only use three different breaks, whereas Steinski on that track uses 10 or more. At the moment I think what we've done is sufficient. It's a kind of halfway house; we've taken it on, but not so far that people can't follow."
Young: "It's the boredom threshold, too. People have a very low boredom threshold nowadays. There's this rhythm that's constant; if you can keep that going but give people something to listen to that changes then it's a good effect.
"I could never listen to a record for more than 30 seconds. But now our music is giving people more stuff in less time. 'Pump Up The Volume' is the only record I've done that I haven't got bored with.
"People are definitely listening to music in a different way now. Anyone who listens to house music from the outside probably can't understand what the hell's going on. People on the inside hear the way the instruments cut in and out of one another; it's almost like a dub. As a musician I've always listened like that." Dorrell warms to the subject: "Rhythms are replacing songs. People can listen to rhythms now, without necessarily dancing.
"The three-minute pop song is really quite an artificial, cosmetic format. Records have got longer. In the beginning, singles were two or three minutes long - Elvis Presley's 'Mystery Train' and stuff like that. In the '70s the 12-inch format gave everyone the extension they wanted. Then continuous BPMs in clubs were a further extension, inasmuch as you could extend the music from 10 minutes to 10 hours through mixing. You take the peaks and rolls as a totality, ending up with a massive canvas as opposed to a miniature. That's something to grasp."
So what happens to song structure?
Young: "There are remnants of a song structure in 'Pump Up The Volume'; it hasn't been completely destroyed. We view the piano as the chorus, and the gaps in between as the verses. Maybe people appreciate that subconsciously rather than consciously."
So come clean, guys. Is it OK to take anything from anywhere? The talkative duo have their final say.
Young: "Yes, but you can't draw a line as to where people should stop. Everyone has their own view of where the line between plagiarism and creativity lies."
What about lifting a whole rhythm track? Dorrell: "People have been pinching rhythm tracks for years. Why stop there? The Rolling Stones ripped off a whole genre."
They did indeed.
Interview by Simon Trask
mu:zines is the result of thousands of hours of effort, and will require many thousands more going forward to reach our goals of getting all this content online.
If you value this resource, you can support this project - it really helps!
New issues that have been donated or scanned for us this month.
All donations and support are gratefully appreciated - thank you.
Do you have any of these magazine issues?
If so, and you can donate, lend or scan them to help complete our archive, please get in touch via the Contribute page - thanks!